Page 2 - 2011-ciani
P. 2

54 A. C. Ciani and C. Capiluppi                                   influence individuals through early experiences during infancy
                                                                  (Forgas & Van Heck, 1992), given that most immigrants lived
new approach, initially developed to study sexual orientation     their childhood on the mainland. To address this alternative
(Camperio Ciani, Corna, & Capiluppi, 2004), consisting of         Early Experiences hypothesis, we studied the immigrant
comparing small isolated populations with a reference             subjects in greater depth. Finally, we discuss whether a general
population which shares a common historical, linguistic and       explanation for such a rapid and significant personality
cultural context. In a population survey conducted in three       divergence in small isolated environments can be derived and
Italian archipelagos they found significant differences            then extended to similar contexts.
between islander and mainlander personality traits on a
Big Five scale (Costa & McCrae, 1992; Goldberg, 1990;                 For each question we present arguments based on
McCrae & Costa, 1999) based on the adjectives question-           empirical evidence by comparing the relevant sample subsets
naire validated for Italian language (Perugini & Di Blas,         of the population under investigation.
2002; Perugini & Leone, 1994; Piconi, 1998). The emerging
islander personality profile was characterized by lower            METHODS
extraversion and openness to experience, and more
conscientiousness and emotional stability than in the             Population under investigation
mainland inhabitants: they suggested these personality
differences could represent traits which result in better         We selected the Egadi archipelago, the southernmost set of
adaptation to the island environment. Immigrants to the           islands off the coast of western Sicily because it has similar
islands (who had been resident for at least 20 years) were        linguistic and socio-ecological conditions to those of the
significantly more extraverted and more open to experience         previous study, and we had access to all the relevant historical
than original islanders, that is they retained a mainlander       and geographical details required to test our hypothesis.
profile despite long-lasting permanence in the insular
environment, which led the authors to suspect the presence            The Egadiislands (Favignana, Levanzo and Marettimo
of a genetic influence on personality, however, the study          and a few other islets) constitute the southernmost Italian
could not definitely exclude that behaviours learned during        archipelago, 15–30 sea miles off the western shore of Sicily
childhood were retained in adulthood. Emigrant islanders          where the town of Trapani is situated. The total population in
were found to be more open to experience and more                 the Egadi archipelago is at present 4394, of which 220 are
extraverted than sedentary islanders. Camperio Ciani et al.       resident in Levanzo Island, 450 in Marettimo Island and the
(2007) suggested gene flow as the possible genetic selection       rest in Favignana Island. Only 50% of those who are listed as
mechanism (Bodmer & Cavalli-Sforza, 1976; Camperio                resident are actually living on the island, the remaining 50%
Ciani, Stanyon, Scheffrahn, & Sampurno, 1989), that is the        are listed as being resident but have, in fact, emigrated. These
voluntary emigration of fertile individuals who were, in this     islands fulfil the requisites of the long-lasting isolation
case, higher in extraversion and openess to experience.           required to highlight the hypothesized effect of the adaptive
                                                                  selection for personality traits. Even if the archipelago is now
    The purpose of this study is firstly to assess whether the     a tourist destination, during the last 400 years these islands
personality trait differences between islanders and main-         have experienced limited immigration, a fact confirmed by
landers reported in Camperio Ciani et al. (2007; Camperio         surname analysis and by studies of birth, marriage and death
Ciani & Ceccarini, 2002) can be detected in a different           registries (Veronese, 2003). This means that for at least 20–
archipelago with similar socio-ecological conditions to           25 generations the small village communities did not mix
previously studied islands.                                       extensively with the mainland population.

    Hence, we try to answer the following three questions:            In order to allow a detailed comparison with the study by
                                                                  Camperio Ciani et al. (2007), the same criteria were used to
 1. Are there differences in personality traits between           identify the specific control population. The population of
     islanders and mainlanders?                                   the whole of Italy is not adequate because Italy is a highly
                                                                  fractioned country in terms of regional culture, dialects and
 2. Can these differences be ascribed to stable traits of         traditions. To account for such variables the closest coastal
     genetic origin, or are they due to individual flexible        land to the Egadi was selected as the control population, in
     adaptation to the environment?                               the region of Trapani (Sicily), which shares the same culture,
                                                                  language and latitude. This control population, composed of
 3. Which mechanism could account for the origin of these         people from both urban and rural areas, is defined as
     differences?                                                 Mainlanders and is used as the reference group to which all
                                                                  other populations are compared. Naturally this control
    Van Oers proposed the ‘founder effect’ (Van Oers, 2007) as    population has also its limits due to its limited geographic
a further explanation of genetic mechanism to explain how         distribution and different history from the archipelago.
these personality differences come about. The founder effect is
by definition a chance effect (non-adaptive) (Bodmer & Cavalli-    Historical account
Sforza, 1976), hence if the same results can be found in a novel
archipelago, this alternative hypothesis would be less likely.    Cave graffiti show that the Egadi Islands have been populated
                                                                  since the Paleolithic era and since then a multitude of
    A further alternative to the genetic explanation of the
personality differences suggested by Camperio Ciani et al. is
the influence of early experience. According to the Big Five
paradigm, the first years of life might contribute to the shaping
of the definitive personality profile (Costa & McCrae, 1992;
McCrae & Costa, 1999). The role of the environment could

Copyright # 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.                          Eur. J. Pers. 25: 53–64 (2011)
                                                                                 DOI: 10.1002/per
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7