Page 2 - 2011-ciani
P. 2
54 A. C. Ciani and C. Capiluppi influence individuals through early experiences during infancy
(Forgas & Van Heck, 1992), given that most immigrants lived
new approach, initially developed to study sexual orientation their childhood on the mainland. To address this alternative
(Camperio Ciani, Corna, & Capiluppi, 2004), consisting of Early Experiences hypothesis, we studied the immigrant
comparing small isolated populations with a reference subjects in greater depth. Finally, we discuss whether a general
population which shares a common historical, linguistic and explanation for such a rapid and signiï¬cant personality
cultural context. In a population survey conducted in three divergence in small isolated environments can be derived and
Italian archipelagos they found signiï¬cant differences then extended to similar contexts.
between islander and mainlander personality traits on a
Big Five scale (Costa & McCrae, 1992; Goldberg, 1990; For each question we present arguments based on
McCrae & Costa, 1999) based on the adjectives question- empirical evidence by comparing the relevant sample subsets
naire validated for Italian language (Perugini & Di Blas, of the population under investigation.
2002; Perugini & Leone, 1994; Piconi, 1998). The emerging
islander personality proï¬le was characterized by lower METHODS
extraversion and openness to experience, and more
conscientiousness and emotional stability than in the Population under investigation
mainland inhabitants: they suggested these personality
differences could represent traits which result in better We selected the Egadi archipelago, the southernmost set of
adaptation to the island environment. Immigrants to the islands off the coast of western Sicily because it has similar
islands (who had been resident for at least 20 years) were linguistic and socio-ecological conditions to those of the
signiï¬cantly more extraverted and more open to experience previous study, and we had access to all the relevant historical
than original islanders, that is they retained a mainlander and geographical details required to test our hypothesis.
proï¬le despite long-lasting permanence in the insular
environment, which led the authors to suspect the presence The Egadiislands (Favignana, Levanzo and Marettimo
of a genetic influence on personality, however, the study and a few other islets) constitute the southernmost Italian
could not deï¬nitely exclude that behaviours learned during archipelago, 15–30 sea miles off the western shore of Sicily
childhood were retained in adulthood. Emigrant islanders where the town of Trapani is situated. The total population in
were found to be more open to experience and more the Egadi archipelago is at present 4394, of which 220 are
extraverted than sedentary islanders. Camperio Ciani et al. resident in Levanzo Island, 450 in Marettimo Island and the
(2007) suggested gene flow as the possible genetic selection rest in Favignana Island. Only 50% of those who are listed as
mechanism (Bodmer & Cavalli-Sforza, 1976; Camperio resident are actually living on the island, the remaining 50%
Ciani, Stanyon, Scheffrahn, & Sampurno, 1989), that is the are listed as being resident but have, in fact, emigrated. These
voluntary emigration of fertile individuals who were, in this islands fulï¬l the requisites of the long-lasting isolation
case, higher in extraversion and openess to experience. required to highlight the hypothesized effect of the adaptive
selection for personality traits. Even if the archipelago is now
The purpose of this study is ï¬rstly to assess whether the a tourist destination, during the last 400 years these islands
personality trait differences between islanders and main- have experienced limited immigration, a fact conï¬rmed by
landers reported in Camperio Ciani et al. (2007; Camperio surname analysis and by studies of birth, marriage and death
Ciani & Ceccarini, 2002) can be detected in a different registries (Veronese, 2003). This means that for at least 20–
archipelago with similar socio-ecological conditions to 25 generations the small village communities did not mix
previously studied islands. extensively with the mainland population.
Hence, we try to answer the following three questions: In order to allow a detailed comparison with the study by
Camperio Ciani et al. (2007), the same criteria were used to
1. Are there differences in personality traits between identify the speciï¬c control population. The population of
islanders and mainlanders? the whole of Italy is not adequate because Italy is a highly
fractioned country in terms of regional culture, dialects and
2. Can these differences be ascribed to stable traits of traditions. To account for such variables the closest coastal
genetic origin, or are they due to individual flexible land to the Egadi was selected as the control population, in
adaptation to the environment? the region of Trapani (Sicily), which shares the same culture,
language and latitude. This control population, composed of
3. Which mechanism could account for the origin of these people from both urban and rural areas, is deï¬ned as
differences? Mainlanders and is used as the reference group to which all
other populations are compared. Naturally this control
Van Oers proposed the ‘founder effect’ (Van Oers, 2007) as population has also its limits due to its limited geographic
a further explanation of genetic mechanism to explain how distribution and different history from the archipelago.
these personality differences come about. The founder effect is
by deï¬nition a chance effect (non-adaptive) (Bodmer & Cavalli- Historical account
Sforza, 1976), hence if the same results can be found in a novel
archipelago, this alternative hypothesis would be less likely. Cave grafï¬ti show that the Egadi Islands have been populated
since the Paleolithic era and since then a multitude of
A further alternative to the genetic explanation of the
personality differences suggested by Camperio Ciani et al. is
the influence of early experience. According to the Big Five
paradigm, the ï¬rst years of life might contribute to the shaping
of the deï¬nitive personality proï¬le (Costa & McCrae, 1992;
McCrae & Costa, 1999). The role of the environment could
Copyright # 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Eur. J. Pers. 25: 53–64 (2011)
DOI: 10.1002/per